<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: One desk, two versions</title> <atom:link href="http://sandal-woodsblog.com/2010/06/03/one-desk-two-versions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://sandal-woodsblog.com/2010/06/03/one-desk-two-versions/</link> <description>Woodworking with passion - The woodworking blog and podcast of Al Navas</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:29:11 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: Al Navas</title><link>http://sandal-woodsblog.com/2010/06/03/one-desk-two-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-3767</link> <dc:creator>Al Navas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:07:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sandal-woodsblog.com/?p=8542#comment-3767</guid> <description>I had not thought about this - but will look at it closely when I mock up the shell. Thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had not thought about this &#8211; but will look at it closely when I mock up the shell. Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Torch02</title><link>http://sandal-woodsblog.com/2010/06/03/one-desk-two-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-3765</link> <dc:creator>Torch02</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 02:02:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sandal-woodsblog.com/?p=8542#comment-3765</guid> <description>How about a triangular cleat (think half of a rectangle) that splits the center of the area beneath the top?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a triangular cleat (think half of a rectangle) that splits the center of the area beneath the top?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Al Navas</title><link>http://sandal-woodsblog.com/2010/06/03/one-desk-two-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-3764</link> <dc:creator>Al Navas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:43:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sandal-woodsblog.com/?p=8542#comment-3764</guid> <description>Jason,
Both versions have a top 30 inches wide and 60 inches long. The older desk, and not covered here, was 72 inches long. Thank goodness for the reduced length!
Thanks for your feedback - it is great stuff! I have a feeling that veneering adds considerable stiffness to the desk you are using. In fact, this was a way I had considered, until I realized the client is totally against anything veneered. And I definitely understand his position, although I like veneered items, when done properly.
Your Option 3 is probably out, as an architect at Tommy MacDonald&#039;s 207 Forum has stated that square and hollow in this size might not be appropriate, as it is too weak due to its thin sides. However, I am still looking at that option, as it *could* apply here. Also looking at a torsion box option, and also an apron across the front opening, as your Option 1. I had not considered your Option 2, but it is definitely doable. Thanks for such valuable input!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p><p>Both versions have a top 30 inches wide and 60 inches long. The older desk, and not covered here, was 72 inches long. Thank goodness for the reduced length!</p><p>Thanks for your feedback &#8211; it is great stuff! I have a feeling that veneering adds considerable stiffness to the desk you are using. In fact, this was a way I had considered, until I realized the client is totally against anything veneered. And I definitely understand his position, although I like veneered items, when done properly.</p><p>Your Option 3 is probably out, as an architect at Tommy MacDonald&#8217;s 207 Forum has stated that square and hollow in this size might not be appropriate, as it is too weak due to its thin sides. However, I am still looking at that option, as it *could* apply here. Also looking at a torsion box option, and also an apron across the front opening, as your Option 1. I had not considered your Option 2, but it is definitely doable. Thanks for such valuable input!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Young</title><link>http://sandal-woodsblog.com/2010/06/03/one-desk-two-versions/comment-page-1/#comment-3763</link> <dc:creator>Jason Young</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:31:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sandal-woodsblog.com/?p=8542#comment-3763</guid> <description>Hi Al,
You are correct in that the mid-span of the &quot;unsupported&quot; edge will be the weakest.  If I&#039;m correct in my estimates, the shell version of your desk likely spans about 70&quot; and your top is likely 7/8&quot; thick I&#039;m guessing.  The desk I&#039;m sitting at at work right now has similar specs and I suspect it&#039;s veneeredd particle board.  I&#039;ve never had a problem with is sagging while I&#039;m working on it.  I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d jump up and down on it but it works well for what it&#039;s intended.
If you do want to stiffen the edge just in case, I can think of a couple of options:
1. Add a shallow apron under it (I realize this takes up knee space)
2. Laminate a vertical piece of edging that is deeper that the top.
3. Rout a channel under the edge and install a piece of square hollow structural steel lengthwise from end to end
Just a couple of brainstorm ideas for you to consider.
Jason.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Al,</p><p>You are correct in that the mid-span of the &#8220;unsupported&#8221; edge will be the weakest.  If I&#8217;m correct in my estimates, the shell version of your desk likely spans about 70&#8243; and your top is likely 7/8&#8243; thick I&#8217;m guessing.  The desk I&#8217;m sitting at at work right now has similar specs and I suspect it&#8217;s veneeredd particle board.  I&#8217;ve never had a problem with is sagging while I&#8217;m working on it.  I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d jump up and down on it but it works well for what it&#8217;s intended.</p><p>If you do want to stiffen the edge just in case, I can think of a couple of options:<br
/> 1. Add a shallow apron under it (I realize this takes up knee space)<br
/> 2. Laminate a vertical piece of edging that is deeper that the top.<br
/> 3. Rout a channel under the edge and install a piece of square hollow structural steel lengthwise from end to end</p><p>Just a couple of brainstorm ideas for you to consider.</p><p>Jason.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
