February 8, 2012

Workholding and consistency with the Leigh FMT frame mortise & tenon jig

Workholding and consistency/repeatability, in addition to the superb accuracy and precision of the Leigh FMT jig! One question from a reader prompts me to write this.

After reading one earlier post on this blog, Charles in Houston, TX, asked if I had much trouble aligning the twin mortises with the tenons properly, to ensure a)_square fit, and b)_easy and tight assembly.

I thought it would be best to show how I do it, and what I recommend, using photos. And if you are reading this and spot a problem with my definitions, concepts, or procedure, please let me know in the Comments section of this post (linked just below the title for this post), or via e-mail to sandal_woods@bbwi.net.

First, some definitions and one image:

From Class Vocabulary at Tooling University, LLC:

accuracy: The difference between a measurement reading and the true value of that measurement.

repeatability: The ability to obtain consistent results when measuring the same part with the same measuring instrument.

precision: The degree to which an instrument will repeat the same measurement over a period of time.

And from Understanding Precision and Accuracy,CHE 353M, Fall 2002 at the Wilson Research Group, the University of Texas at Austin:

 

accuracy-precision

The FMT is inherently a very accurate and precise instrument – it was made to be so (bottom-right on the bull’s eye image above). This means it can make a mortise and tenon joint that fits very well; and  better yet, to do so even if multiple mortises and multiple tenons are present on stretchers like the ones below:

 

stretcher-double-tenons-2

And the FMT can do all of this accurately, repeatably, and precisely; using calipers I can verify the thickness of the mortise and the tenons, and their length and width. Of course, I must be able to set up the machine properly to do so. But I must do the layout accurately, to get the results I want.

I want these stretchers to be centered on the legs, such that the eye cannot tell misalignment or misplacement. This is where I must also be accurate with the layout and measurements, and with positioning of the legs and the stretchers on the jig. Once I do this, I put my work on the bottom-right of the image above, close to the bull’s eye. I am helping the FMT work for me, to give me the results I need.

Now, to answer the question Charles posed: Do I have much trouble aligning the mortises and/or the tenons properly, to ensure square fit and assembly, and position on the legs? My answer is no, I have no trouble at all doing so. I take some precautions to lay out the joints; and more precautions and care to properly position not only the work pieces on the jig, but also to move and to position the jig’s sliding table to the dimensions I need. To accomplish all of this repeatably, I use the workholding capability of the jig, as I explain below.

Working with scrap pieces to set up the joinery on the FMT, I found the legs to be very heavy. In fact, I felt I needed to ensure no movement during the machining of the mortises on the legs, as the bulk of the leg would be cantilevered on one side. Enter workholding, using clamps:

 

workholding-full-front-view

workholding-full-left-view

Using this arrangement, I was satisfied the heavy legs would not move as I plunged the 3/8-inch router bit into the wood.

Now, some details.

First, positioning and holding the work piece is critical. This is accomplished on the FMT with clamps on the body of the jig, and on the outrigger assemblies. The jig body accepts cam-action speed clamps — the four clamps holding the leg in the photo below; on the outriggers I use any other type of clamp that won’t slip under pressure or light bumping:

 

workholding-clamps

The FMT ships with two Cam-Action clamps. I bought two additional ones:

 

workholding-cam-actionclamps

In the photo above, the vertical fence in the center is used to register one side of the stretchers when the tenons are machined. I leave it in place for the duration of all machining operations. Once set, it is extremely difficult to move; it will move if bumped hard with a heavy work piece. But I recommend double-checking its position once in a while.

It is possible to use just about any type of clamp on the outriggers. However, I recommend staying away from spring clamps, as their holding ability with large pieces, such as the heavy legs I machined in this example, is marginal at best. In the next photo, taken from behind the outrigger, I show a Bessey bar clamp holding the leg, as extra insurance from (primarily) vertical movement due to the mass of the leg:

 

workholding-left-outrigger-clamp

And on the right outrigger board, a FatMax Xtreme speed clamp:

 

workholding-rightt-outrigger-clamp

This clamping arrangement on the right outrigger is the key to accurate positioning, and re-positioning of the legs, for reproducible machining of the mortises. The end of the leg is registered against the edge of the board held tightly in place by the clamp. Barring any unforeseen problem, the board stays in place until all leg mortises are machined.

In summary:

  • The FMT is a wonderful jig that allows machining of mortises and tenons very quickly and accurately.
  • As users, we can influence the results we get with it; care in positioning a work piece reduces the chances of moving a fence or reference point.
  • As good as the FMT is, I recommend taking precautions and measures to ensure reproducible positioning and re-positioning of work pieces machined on this jig.
  • I suggest care in layout and measurements.
  • Always use scrap pieces to set up the machine properly, not your precious project boards.
  • Check to ensure the router bit has not shifted position – it is possible that, on some routers, the bit will go deeper in the collet, resulting in shallow mortises and short tenons.
  • Make sure the plunge depth on the router has not changed.
  • And finally, conduct periodic checks of the jig setup, whether stops on the outriggers, or the position and squareness of the vertical fence used to machine the tenons, or the table movement X- and Y-axis stops.

My thanks to Charles in Houston, TX, for your question. I hope your question and my answers and suggestions will also help other readers!

.

 

 

#38. WIA: Part 3 of 3 – Forgotten Workbenches and Workholding

Download High Resolution
Total running time: 48 mins, 54 seconds

This episode is all about workholding:

  1. Face vises – Racking is the main reason The Schwarz does not like them.
  2. Leg vise: Elegant, cheap, GREAT!
  3. Shoulder vise: Best choice for dovetailing drawers – it is fast. It is great, but too complex.
  4. Crochet: Used with holdfasts, it is great, and cool.
  5. Sliding dog vise: Otherwise called the Wagon Vise. Recently installed one on of his benches.
  6. End (tail) vise on European-style benches: Fragile, and they sag!
  7. Dogs: Round or square? Likes square, bur coming around to round. It is hard to make square holes. The round dogs are best because there is a large after-market that caters to these.
  8. Battens: Offer an effective way to work: Low profile, and cool.
  9. Planing stops: Made from scraps; make them as thin and wide as possible; install on the face vise.
  10. Planing boards: Great if the workbench is not flat; Chris has made available a construction drawing on his blog.
  11. Deadman: Installed on his Roubo; has nothing but praise for it.
  12. Other benches: Concrete block bench; wheelwright’s bench, with leg vise and cabinets; the Modern Roubo”; the English hybrid, with angled leg vise but straight legs; Moxon’s bench; the “sink” bench (laughter!), which is a Shaker bench corrupted.

The Schwarz answered many questions, all terrific and relevant, until he ran out of time. The discussion could easily have run much longer, but everyone had to run to lunch, to the Marketplace, and to other terrific sessions.

I took a good look at the construction of the sliding deadman…

.

#37. WIA: Part 2 of 3 – Forgotten Workbenches and Workholding

Download High Resolution
Total running time: 39 mins., 52 seconds

In this episode Christopher Schwarz, Editor of Popular Woodworking and Woodworking Magazine, presents, discusses, and points out pros and cons of several benches and their features:

  1. The European bench: He is not happy with this form, but also is not anti-European-form. His problem with this one: People take old principles and apply them to other benches. He likes to apply the kitchen door test (typical sizes we work on) and the kitchen carcase test (pushes him to narrower benches) to all benches, for suitability.
  2. Materials: For example, the Nicholson bench required only a small amount of material. He likes soft woods for his benches; SYP (Southern yellow pine) does not move much, is stiff ((no flexing), it dents (no detriment), and he can flatten a workbench in 45 minutes using a #8 jointer hand plane diagonally. Also, SYP does not sag; however, one of his benches has developed a low spot i.n the middle. He believes the critical area that requires total flatness on a bench top is the front 8 inches to 10 inches.
  3. Roman style bench: This is the one he finds in most pro shops. Pros: It is simple, and stout. Con: No planing stops, etc.
  4. The French undercarriage: Pros: Great clamping ability. Con: Requires a log of material, primarily due to its massive legs.
  5. The English bench: Pros: Requires very little wood. Con: Undercarriage clamping is tough.
  6. The Danish bench: Pro: Easy to knock down. Don: Can’t clamp easily on the front.
  7. The Shaker bench: Pros: Great looks, and storage for everything and everybody. Cons: Hard to clamp on.
  8. Tool trays: Cons: They are always full of “stuff”.
  9. The Hayward bench: The thin top flexes; but the front apron takes away some of the flex.
  10. Top thickness: At 3″ to 4″, the beam strength is enough to provide support on the legs. Holdfasts reach their holding limit around 4 inches.
  11. Bench height: For hand planing, it should hit the joint between the pinkie and the palm of the hand.
  12. Bench width: Finds that 22″ is great, but 18″ tends to be tippy.
  13. Bench finish: NO slick film. The formula he uses is 50/50 BLO (boiled linseed oil) / varnish, with solvent added to make it possible to wipe on the mixture. There is no need to finish the underside, unless the owner wants to finish it.

Next: The ending of the session on Forgotten Workbenches and Workholding.

.

Related posts: Watch more videos from Woodworking in America on this blog.

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin